NL Rookie of the Year ballot E-mail
Written by Pat Lackey   
Thursday, 15 October 2009 10:48

This ballot is for the Baseball Bloggers Alliance, a group of baseball bloggers (duh) who are pooling votes together to give out our own post-season award.

This is an incredibly tough vote for me, for two reasons. The first is that two Pirates are prominently involved here, which means that it's not exactly easy for me to stay objective. The second is that I'm never entirely sure what the Rookie of the Year award really is rewarding. Is it the player that had the best rookie season, or is it a player that had a good rookie season that's going to be a really good player down the road? Some part of me can't look at rookies without projecting their futures; it's what makes rookies exciting and hey, as a Pirate fan it's pretty much all I have going for me. If I were judging by the second criteria, my ballot would probably go 3.) Colby Rasmus, 2.) Andrew McCutchen, and 1.) Tommy Hanson.

But that can't be what Rookie of the Year is all about because we just don't know what's going to happen in the future. It's not fair to punish Garrett Jones or Randy Wells just because their ceilings aren't as high as McCutchen or Hanson. They had great rookie years and they deserve consideration just the same as everyone else on the list. Click after the jump to find that consideration (or, depending on if you agree with me, that flimsy rationalization).

So let's start by narrowing the ballot down to the top three. This is an impossible task starting from the following list: Andrew McCutchen, Garrett Jones, J.A. Happ, Randy Wells, Tommy Hanson, Chris Coghlan, Casey McGhee, Colby Rasmus, and maybe even a few others who deserve consideration. Starting from this list of eight, though, I'm going to leave five guys out that deserve votes. This would be much easier if it were like the MVP and I got to list ten.

So let's pick three that stand out. My personal biases aside, Andrew McCutchen lead NL rookies in WAR, showed power, speed, got on base, and played center field. He makes the top three. Of the three pitchers, Hanson, Happ, and Wells finished with almost identical ERA+ (146 for Happ, 144 for Hanson, 143 for Wells) and it's not easy to separate them. Hanson was spectacular; 8.2 K/9 as a 22-year old rookie is amazing and his 1.183 WHIP leads the group. He only threw 127 2/3 innings, though, so I'm inclined to leave him off the ballot. Happ and Wells threw a similar amount of innings (166 for Happ, 165 1/3 for Wells), while Happ had a slightly better strikeout rate and Wells had a better walk rate. Both guys probably pitched a little over their heads, but the advanced metrics say Wells was better; his WAR is 3.0 compared to Happ's 1.8 and his xFIP is 4.28 compard to Happ's 4.58. Wells got more ground balls, pitched more innings as a starter, and pitching out of Wrigley negates any advantage Happ might've had pitching in Citizen's Bell. Wells makes the ballot, too.

The last spot, for me, comes down to the position players. Hanson's inning count and Happ's time in the bullpen leave them out, so we're down to Rasmus, Coghlan, Jones, and McGhee. Rasmus played great in center field (UZR of 10.2), but was not so great at the plate, hitting .251/.307/.407. He showed some flashes, but wasn't consistent at all. Coglhan was awesome at the plate, but a butcher with the glove as he learned left field, hitting .321/.390/.460 but going -9.7 in 123 games in left field. McGhee has a similar story to Coghlan, .301/.360/.499 but -7.1 at third base, where he spent most of the year. Jones was spectacular hitting .293/.374/.567 with 21 homers in just 82 games without being a real butcher anywhere in the field, but that just 82 games part weighs heavily against him the way Hanson's low inning count hurts him. For me, this one comes down to Coghlan and Jones and Coghlan gets the vote because of playing time and because I'm like that Little League coach that's harder on his own kid (that's a warning to you, FutureSon).

And now, I'm agonizing. I'm going to put Coghlan second, you see, and if it was so close between him and Jones, shouldn't Jones be third? And if I'm putting McCutchen first (which I am, oops, there goes the drama) and he only played 108 games, then why am I punishing Hanson and Jones, who had the most impressive stat lines, albeit in shorter seasons? But no, I've reasoned my way down, and I'm sticking with the ballot I've justified to myself. Wells, the best rookie pitcher this year once all things are considered, goes third. Coghlan, who had a great season at the plate and who I'm not punishing as much for his defense because he's never played outfield before this year, goes second. And McCutchen, who did everything well and nothing poorly, who hit .286/.365/.471 with 12 homers and 22 stolen bases and who had a nearly even UZR (-0.8) while playing in PNC, with it's giant left-center gap, goes first.

So here's my ballot, which comes with one plea: Dear BBA, let's expand the ballot next year.

1. Andrew McCutchen, CF, Pirates
2. Chris Coghlan, LF, Marlins
3. Randy Wells, SP, Cubs


Digg! Facebook! Technorati! StumbleUpon! BallHype: hype it up!
Comments (15)add comment

azibuck said:

...
Pat hates Garret Jones.
 
October 15, 2009
Votes: +0

whygavs said:

Well
As a consolation to Mr. Jones, I'm working on a huge and glowing profile of him for another website that should be up next week.
 
October 15, 2009 | url
Votes: +0

TheTaxidermist said:

...
I don't think you can really fault Jones for having so many homeruns and so few RBI's. What do you expect when NOBODY gets on base for you?
 
October 15, 2009
Votes: +0

whygavs said:

Jones's RBIs
Didn't even briefly consider RBI totals for even one player on this list. Jones could've had 90 RBIs with this exact same stat line in 82 games and it wouldn't have changed things for me.
 
October 15, 2009 | url
Votes: +0

w.k. kortas said:

...
All I know is that, when the time comes, I hope someone gives the future Mrs. Lackey a copy of The Science of Hittingat the baby shower, because I don't want to be thatlittle tyke if he doesn't have command of the strike zone.
 
October 15, 2009
Votes: +0

whygavs said:

WK Kortas-
This is my favorite comment of all-time. Well done, sir.
 
October 15, 2009 | url
Votes: +0

Hamburger said:

...
This is the worst year ever to be a rookie in the NL (or I guess the best based on performance). Jones probably doesn't finish higher than 5th in the voting this year and his season was nearly identical to (maybe slightly better than) Ryan Howard's 2005 when he won.

McCutchen, Coghlan, Wells, Hanson, Happ, and Jones probably all win in 90% of years.
 
October 15, 2009
Votes: +0

alcofan said:

...
Pennsylvania power. 5-1 Phils.
 
October 15, 2009
Votes: +0

andy coulter said:

...
Why isn't there a "Rookie Pitcher of the Year" category anymore? I thought that's what Don Robinson won in '78, Mike Dunne in '87 and Tim Wakefield won in '92. Bring that back so we can have 'Cutch or G.I. go ROY. Or even Co-Rookies of the Year. That would be sweet! Sorry, I AM biased.
 
October 16, 2009
Votes: +0

sludgeworm said:

RE: Honus Lackey
The ex-Mrs Tabata might be available in 3-5 years. Bridal shower in the morning, wedding in the afternoon, strapping young baby boy by evening. With some luck she might be able to delivery a 12 year old with a 89 mph fastball.
Probably should have a poll to select the young Latchkey Lackeys' name...Nyjer Lackey...perhaps?...
 
October 16, 2009
Votes: +0

w.k. kortas said:

...
Nyjer Franquelis Lackey.
 
October 16, 2009
Votes: +1

TheTaxidermist said:

...
If anybody got a chance to catch the Phillies/Dodgers game, the Phillies managed to blow the game in the 8th inning with Pirate-like efficiency. Can anybody explain to me why they took Pedro Martinez out to start the 8th inning when he only let off 2 hits at that point? Maybe I missed something because I was doing other things while they game was on.
 
October 17, 2009
Votes: -1

bucdaddy said:

...
Because complete games aren't allowed anymore, no matter how well your starter is pitching, if it could lead to the manager getting second-guessed for leaving him in too long. For instance, if your starter has an 11-run lead and gives up a sac fly with two out in the ninth, and you have a Rule 5 arm in the bullpen who could use some work, then you HAVE to yank him. All the smart managers know this, it's in The Book.
 
October 17, 2009
Votes: +0

whygavs said:

Pulling starters
Pedo hadn't pitched since September 30th and only threw more than 100 pitches twice this year. I'm not sure it was a bad call for Manuel to take him out, even with the way the game ended.
 
October 17, 2009 | url
Votes: +0

Joe M. Rubino said:

Coghlan's Fielding Getting a Bad Rap
I am stupefied by all this talk of Chris Coghlan being a bad fielder. Did any of these writers making these remarks actually see him play? Or are they just looking at the stats and making a judgment? I suspect that these folks who call Coghlan a "butcher" are merely parroting something they saw written by another blogger and are assuming that they can get away with the remark unchallenged. well, I am challenging you. First of all, I watched the majority of his games in left field and give him EXTRA credit for the way he played, since, as a second baseman in HS and college, he never played a day of outfield in his career. On top of that, he put together a highlight reel of spectacular catches, diving, lunging, over the shoulder, etc. To my thinking, his adapting to a strange position due to a team need makes him an even MORE deserving ROY candidate than he would be under normal circumstances.
 
October 29, 2009
Votes: +2

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

Follow WHYGAVS

About Bloguin

Bloguin is the revolutionary blog network specifically focused on helping bloggers get the most out of their websites. We're currently working on building a large network of online communities and hope to expand our blogging coverage to include a wide range of topics.

Advertisers

The Bloguin Network allows advertisers to promote their products and services to our ever-growing number of visitors. We offer both site-specific ad placements as well as the ability to run a network-wide campaign. If you're interested in working with Bloguin to meet your advertising needs, please contact us.

Most-Wanted List

The Bloguin Network is always looking to expand. Here are some of our high-priority areas that we're specifically looking to grow. If you're a blogger and interested in joining our network, please fill out our application form.

  1. NBA/Basketball Blogs
  2. NFL Blogs
  3. Major League Baseball Blogs

The Bloguin Login

The Bloguin Login gives you full access to everything our network has to offer. Your name and password will work for each and every one of our sites. Signing up is simple, and will allow you to post in all our forums, create member blogs, and access other cool features! What are you waiting for? Create an Account!