Game 39: Pirates 8 Nationals 5 E-mail
Written by Pat Lackey   
Tuesday, 19 May 2009 23:31

Yesterday afternoon, I got an e-mail from my dad. It read, in part:

It's 5-19-09, and what are the Bucs, 17-21?  A year ago on this date the Bucs were 21-23.  And yet, why does it seem that I and many others feel like this year's version is better than last year's version?  Optical illusion?  Did we drink the Kool-Aid?  Have we been snowed?

I thought about that a bit, and though I agree with the sentiment that these Pirates are better than last year's, I was unable to adequately verbalize a reason and actually, I still haven't responded (though I suppose this post counts). I just have a feeling that this team is different. I don't think they're a playoff team or a .500 team, but I do think they're different, if that makes sense. They're not necessarily good, but for the first time in a long time, I feel like maybe they're at least headed in the direction of something good.

This win is a perfect example. It had all the debilitating hallmarks of a bad Pirate loss. Early lead? Check. Complete offensive disappearance? Check. Late comeback by the terrible opponent? Check. Inevitable feeling of doom while the other team rallied in the bottom of the ninth? Check. And then somehow, Tom Gorzelanny, suddenly recast as a reliever, came it and got a huge strikeout of Willie Harris to end the Nats' rally in the ninth. And sure, it was just Willie Harris, but did anyone see them getting out of that jam? And after that big strikeout, the offense that had been completely dormant (as in no hits and only one base runner) since Andy LaRoche's home run in the third inning suddenly came alive for three runs in the top of the tenth. And sure, it was just the Nationals bullpen, but who saw that rally coming?

This is what occaissionaly drives me insane about baseball. This game was one that, empirically, the Pirates should've won easily, especially after the 5-0 lead in the third inning. And then they blew that easy win to smithereens, deserved to lose the game, managed to not lose only because the Nationals are terrible, scored the winning runs against an awful bullpen, and here I am feeling like the accomplished something with this win. My rational and objective brain is screaming, "It's just the Nationals! None of this means anything because they're so awful!" and my subjective Pirate fan heart that wants to believe in anything at all is yelling back, "No hits for six innings! Nats had the winning run on third base in the ninth! We still scraped out a win!" Who knew being a Pirate fan could be so complicated?


Digg! Facebook! Technorati! StumbleUpon! BallHype: hype it up!
Comments (15)add comment

bwzimmerman said:

why i think this team feels different...
1. Veterans are healthy and producing (Freddy, BigLaRoche, Duke)
2. "young" players are (slowly but suredly) blossoming and contributing (LilLaRoche, NyjMo, Moss)
3. the bench is made up of low-risk, low-price veterans (Monroe, Hinske) and promising reclamation projects (DelYo, the catchers)
4. when those in Groups 1 & 2 become compromised (Doumit, NyjMo), Group 3 steps up and performs (JJ & ZZ).
5. and of course, knock-on-wood, a competent, stable starting rotation.

none of this is rocket science to most teams, but we're the proverbial fans encountering an oasis in a desert. Drink deep - could be the first glimmers of a turn-around...

(for the record, i don't think .506 is an unrealistic finish - but ask me again after the trade deadline...)
 
May 20, 2009
Votes: +0

Carnegie Chip said:

...
Yeah, last year we were winning games in an unsustainable fashion. Unless you're the '27 Yankees or '89 A's, you can't figure on winning 8-6 or 10-7 every day. Plus all our offense was concentrated in like 4 guys (Nady, Bay, Nate, Doumit) with bupkiss from the rest.

Like I've said before, its a bit of a blessing not to have any one superstar player because when you get a little bit from everybody, you don't rise and fall with one guy.

PS: JR badly mismanaged this game. He should've hooked Karstens as soon as he got in trouble. 5 good innings is all you can expect out of him.
 
May 20, 2009
Votes: +0

bucconewbie said:

...
any chance the mets are interested in adam laroche now that delgado is out 2 months?
 
May 20, 2009
Votes: +0

Ann said:

...
I was at the game last night, and it was definitely a roller coaster--great feeling until the 4th inning, then dread that the bullpen was going to explode, then disappointment when it actually happened, then back to the awesome feelig when Gorzelanny shut down the ninth and the runs came through in the 10th.

There was also some hilarity thrown in, when the drunk 18 year olds sitting behind me decided to ignore the game and yell at the guy in a Crosby jersey sitting several rows ahead.
 
May 20, 2009
Votes: +0

Caus said:

...
JR mismanages most games...
he loves leaving pitchers in too long.
 
May 20, 2009
Votes: +0

alcofan said:

...
lETS NOT GET TOO EXCITED ABOUT BEATING THE NATS AND ROCKIES.
 
May 20, 2009
Votes: +0

Bishop said:

...
I also don't think we can discount the fact that our defense is light-years better than last year's squad. For a pitch-to-contact staff like the Pirates', being able to get to balls and not screw things up once they are gotten is critical. Andy, Nyjer and Brandon are all significant upgrades over their '08 counterparts, and a healthy Freddy is certainly better than an injured Freddy.

Also relevant is the fact that our C's are throwing out 31% of base-stealers. Again, we have lot of guys on base, but eliminating almost 1/3 of those trying to take an extra base is huge.
 
May 20, 2009
Votes: +0

Sheldon said:

...
I was also at the game (and I hope to see at least one more of this series) and thought of what you've said, Pat: We can't waste a good start from Karstens. We can't waste a homer from Andy. Quite the nail-biter. It must be rough being a Pirate starter, knowing that, regardless of how well you pitch, your team isn't going to get you too many wins.
 
May 20, 2009
Votes: +0

apk said:

...
Speaking of Russel- why did he pitch to Dunn in the 9th once 1st base was open? Sure, you can say that Burnett struck him out, so it's all moot, but why pitch to the guy most likely to end the game with a) you don't have to; and b) you need two outs, so creating a force situation would be nice. The only reason I can see is that leaving the base open lets Jack and Freddy play straight up- but is that really worth it? Thoughts?

And may I remind you that 1st base was open when Capps pitched to Hawpe last Friday- the last time we lost.

I'm just wondering what the managing consensus is for the situation.
 
May 20, 2009
Votes: +0

azibuck said:

Three reasons it feels different
1. Pitching
2. Pitching
3. Pitching

2008 through 39 games:
Starts by Matt Morris - 5, ERA 9.67
Appearances by Frank Ellis - 18, ERA 5.60

2009 through 39 games
Starts by Matt Morris - 0, Karstens ERA 5.21
Appearances by Jesse Chavez - 18, ERA 2.20
 
May 20, 2009
Votes: +0

Ryan said:

...
I don't think anyone is taking these wins over the Nats and Rockies as proof that we're a playoff contender (and if you are, may God help you).

But for once, it's just nice to beat the teams you are supposed to beat.
 
May 20, 2009
Votes: +0

humbucker said:

...
frank ellis = Wreck Specs?
 
May 20, 2009
Votes: +0

Tyler said:

...
I went to the game also, and thought I was going to see a blown lead, but Yay! It was ugly, and Karstens was out there too long, but they managed to win. Let's hope that continues tonight as well. I just can't find anyone to use my other ticket!
 
May 20, 2009
Votes: +0

Sheldon said:

...
Sounds like we need to have a WHYGAVS night here in the District, there's apparently enough of us down here that read this blog.
 
May 20, 2009
Votes: +0

Cory said:

...
For me at least... the difference between last year's start and this year's:
- we're getting similar production in our outfield from "scrubs" (exluding Nate) that we got from Jason Bay and Xavier Nady...
- Our starting pitching has been relatively consistent, which I haven't said in years
- We've overcome big injuries (Doumit still out, Mclouth missed time, Nyjer missed time, dunno if i'm missing anyone) yet the backups are playing at an above average level

Not saying we won't find a way to make this season an embarrassment, but hard to not have hope...
 
May 20, 2009
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

Follow WHYGAVS

About Bloguin

Bloguin is the revolutionary blog network specifically focused on helping bloggers get the most out of their websites. We're currently working on building a large network of online communities and hope to expand our blogging coverage to include a wide range of topics.

Advertisers

The Bloguin Network allows advertisers to promote their products and services to our ever-growing number of visitors. We offer both site-specific ad placements as well as the ability to run a network-wide campaign. If you're interested in working with Bloguin to meet your advertising needs, please contact us.

Most-Wanted List

The Bloguin Network is always looking to expand. Here are some of our high-priority areas that we're specifically looking to grow. If you're a blogger and interested in joining our network, please fill out our application form.

  1. NBA/Basketball Blogs
  2. NFL Blogs
  3. Major League Baseball Blogs

The Bloguin Login

The Bloguin Login gives you full access to everything our network has to offer. Your name and password will work for each and every one of our sites. Signing up is simple, and will allow you to post in all our forums, create member blogs, and access other cool features! What are you waiting for? Create an Account!